Uncovering the Layered History of Glen Canyon Dam: A Tale of Dispossession and Indigenous Voices

Glen Canyon Dam, an emblem of progress for some and a symbol of dispossession for others, has long been a source of contention. Erika Marie Bsumek's latest book, "The Foundations of Glen Canyon Dam: Infrastructures of Dispossession on the Colorado Plateau," sheds new light on this controversial structure by examining the 19th-century Anglo visions of the desert, primarily represented by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), and their conflict with the agricultural practices of the Navajo people.

A Dam's Layered History

Bsumek's work delves into the complex history of Glen Canyon Dam, built in the 1950s, revealing it as an extension of these Anglo visions. She argues that the dam is not merely a utilitarian structure but a physical manifestation of Indigenous dispossession. This perspective challenges traditional narratives surrounding the dam, offering a fresh and nuanced understanding of its origins and impact.

The book highlights the stark contrast between the Mormons' views of the desert as a wasteland ripe for transformation and the Navajo people's reverence for the land. This clash of worldviews set the stage for the construction of Glen Canyon Dam, which inundated sacred sites and disrupted traditional agricultural practices.

The Power of Indigenous Voices

Bsumek emphasizes the importance of Indigenous voices in future discussions about the Colorado River and water policy. She contends that these voices, too often sidelined, are crucial in shaping equitable and sustainable solutions. By centering Indigenous perspectives, Bsumek hopes to foster a more inclusive dialogue around water management and the legacy of infrastructure projects like Glen Canyon Dam.

Ripple Effects and Repercussions

The construction of Glen Canyon Dam had far-reaching consequences, many of which are still felt today. The dam altered the ecosystem of the Grand Canyon National Park, threatening native fish species such as the humpback chub. In response, the Bureau of Reclamation has released a draft plan to manage water flows from the dam to protect these native fish.

However, critics argue that the plan does not go far enough, failing to consider physical changes to the dam's intake structures or evaluate the long-term viability of Lake Powell. These concerns underscore the complexity of managing water resources in a changing climate and the need for innovative solutions that account for both ecological and cultural considerations.

As the debate over Glen Canyon Dam continues, Bsumek's book serves as a powerful reminder of the dam's contentious history and the urgent need to incorporate Indigenous voices in discussions about its future. By reframing the dam as a symbol of dispossession, Bsumek encourages a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play and the potential for more just and sustainable water policies.

In grappling with the legacy of Glen Canyon Dam, we are confronted with questions not only about water management but also about cultural preservation, environmental stewardship, and the very nature of progress. As Bsumek's work demonstrates, these questions are inextricably linked, demanding a holistic approach that acknowledges the past, present, and future implications of our actions.