Advertisment

Landmark Ruling Holds University Accountable for Discriminating Against Student with Mental Health Disorder

In a groundbreaking decision, the High Court found the University of Bristol responsible for a student's suicide due to discrimination against her mental health disorder. This ruling highlights the need for universities to provide better support for students with disabilities and reassess their mental health systems.

author-image
Olalekan Adigun
Updated On
New Update
Landmark Ruling Holds University Accountable for Discriminating Against Student with Mental Health Disorder

Landmark Ruling Holds University Accountable for Discriminating Against Student with Mental Health Disorder

In a landmark decision, the High Court upheld a ruling that the University of Bristol failed to make reasonable adjustments for a student, Natasha Abrahart, who took her own life in April 2018. The university's appeal was rejected, confirming that it had contributed to her death by discriminating against her due to her chronic social anxiety disorder.

Advertisment

A Legal Precedent: Universities' Duty of Care

The case reaffirms the responsibility of universities to provide adequate support for students with disabilities, highlighting the potential for legal repercussions when they fall short. The judge considered the issue of universities having a duty of care towards their students, with implications for legislation and student welfare.

The university was ordered to pay damages and failed on all grounds of appeal, establishing a legal precedent for disability discrimination linked to a person's death. This decision could have far-reaching consequences for higher education institutions, forcing them to reassess their mental health support systems and accommodations for students with disabilities.

Advertisment

The Tragic Story of Lucas Opanuga

Lucas Opanuga, a 20-year-old engineering student at Portsmouth University, also lost his life to suicide after becoming disengaged from his research placement due to the impact of COVID lockdowns. His family was not informed of his wellbeing concerns due to data protection laws.

Lucas had become unresponsive, worked mostly at night, and his bedroom appeared unkempt. Despite a referral to a doctor and a 40-minute phone appointment, no further action was taken. The coroner concluded that Lucas died by suicide and noted that the reduction in human contact during the pandemic likely contributed to his mental health struggles.

Advertisment

A Wake-Up Call for Universities

The tragic stories of Natasha and Lucas serve as a stark reminder of the responsibility universities have towards their students' mental wellbeing. This ruling sends a clear message that higher education institutions must prioritize student welfare and take proactive measures to support those struggling with mental health issues.

As the lines between technology and humanity continue to blur, it is crucial that universities adapt and provide the necessary resources to help students navigate these challenging times. In the wake of this legal precedent, universities must work diligently to create more inclusive and supportive environments for all students, ensuring that no one slips through the cracks.

Advertisment

If you or someone you know is struggling with mental health issues, please seek help from a mental health professional or contact a suicide prevention hotline.

In the eternal dance of humanity with mortality, we must remember that mental health is just as important as physical health. The stories of Natasha and Lucas remind us that the fight for better mental health support in higher education institutions is not only essential but also a matter of life and death.

Today, on February 14, 2024, let us honor their memories by advocating for change and working towards a future where universities prioritize the wellbeing and success of all students.

Advertisment
Advertisment